Editorial
Pradeep Ramteke
Chief Editor
While celebrating the first Republic Day on January 26, 1950, the citizens of this country, along with pioneer Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, felt that the citizens of this country would understand their rights under the Indian Constitution and elevate themselves at all levels.
Ideally, without succumbing to bigotry, understanding equality and breaking the framework of caste differences, he hoped to adopt the concept of “equality, freedom, fraternity, justice”.
That’s why…
According to the Preamble of the Constitution..
— “We, the people of India, to build a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic of India and all its citizens;” social, economic and political justice; freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith, and worship; equality of status and opportunity;
Resolutely determined to achieve and promote among them all a fraternity which assures the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation;
In our Constituent Assembly this day, the 26th day of November, 1949, we hereby adopt and adopt this Constitution.–
***
As above, “How big and vast the perspective of the immediate national leaders was towards the citizens of the country, the citizens of the majority-Bahujan community of the country did not realize it till now, it is the misfortune of the citizens of the majority-Bahujan community of this country!..
According to the above concept, “Society and Deshman”, the immediate nation states, “under the transformation system, we wanted to see the equality of all the citizens of the country till eternity.”
Ideally, his vision of building a society that fosters fraternity towards each other and “consistently plays the role of justice” was among the citizens who cherish the value of freedom and freedom of expression. In other words, every citizen of the country should be economically, socially, educationally, politically, industrially advanced and advanced.
However, rejecting the advanced and advanced society, “Democracy is deadly to the citizens of the country,” which is said to be “Hindu-Muslim dispute,” Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, BJP, have been deliberately removed?
Because the Hindu organization, RSS, will not stir up the heads of the ignorant and ignorant citizens of the country without inflaming the Hindu-Muslim conflict and ideologically mislead them. And BJP’s top leadership knew it well.
And that is why the Hindu organizations, BJP and RSS rejected the secularism and sovereignty of the country and started giving importance to the concept of “Hindu”. It is in this concept of Hinduism that the democracy of the country was or is the problem of the citizens of the country. -Many citizens still don’t seem to understand.
Brahmins and Brahmins in this country are not ready to explain or bring forth the true meaning of “What exactly is a Hindu?”
However, while answering the public questions of National President of Bharat Mukti Morcha, Vaman Meshram, RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and explaining the definition of the word Hindu under the TV channel, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said, “Hindu is not a religion, but a way of life.” There is a procedure.
So? According to RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, “Hindu is not a religion,” Hinduism is literally a way of life.
So what exactly is the process? If no one knows this, it is the unreal fragrance that does not fade in the bouquet? When will the majority of the citizens of this country know this? There is no way to know.
Vaman Meshram, national president of Bharat Mukti Morcha, has publicly stated that the word Hindu is not in any religious book of India and has openly challenged the Brahmins and Brahmins of this country that “Hindu is the word in India’s Vedas, Puranas, Ramayana, Mahabharata, And prove that it is in any other religious book.
If the word Hindu is not part of Indian culture, then the word is meant to be spoken repeatedly by the citizens of India, for what purposes? And why? Ideally, what does this word mean?
“On this, there should be a deep discussion for the safety, welfare and welfare of the citizens of the country. Accordingly, will Brahmins and Brahminists come forward?
“Hindu is a slave, I have heard from the guidance of two speakers,” including National General Secretary of Bharat Mukti Morcha and famous historian Prof. Vilas Kharat.
Indeed, if “Hindu means slaves” in this country,…”SC,ST,OBC,NT,Vigenti,minority,backward class…citizens of the majority Bahujan society,”Brahmin, Brahminist, Sanatani, by and “Why are they being called slaves by the seniors of Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal, RSS organization, leaders, people and BJP’s top leaders, activists? This should also come before the citizens of the country as soon as possible.
According to RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, “Hindu is not a religion,” why, then, “Hindu is a religion” are Brahmins and Brahminists and office-bearers and activists of all their organizations repeatedly saying. This should also be clear.
Because the word Hindu has sparked a debate about gods, temples, religion within the country and the citizens of the country are being fed up in this debate, rather a tradition of keeping it fed up has been started and the government system is being misused to impose some invalid philosophies according to this tradition. is
At the same time, the root cause of this dispute is the struggle of the Brahminists to prevent the majority-Bahujan society from becoming the ruler of this country at all.
Eg :-
On November 21, 1992, the Supreme Court ruled that the entire existence of the OBC community was not recognized.
This decision was of four types…
1) While there are 3 thousand 743 castes in the OBC community, only 1 thousand 900 castes were recognized by the Supreme Court and the remaining 1843 castes were declared outside the OBC community.
2) Out of 52 percent reservation, 27 percent reservation was implemented. (1 thousand 900 according to caste)
3) Actual 14 percent reservation was implemented as per government and administrative policy.
4) Non-Criminal condition which has no wording was inserted in the Constitution.
Should the decision of the Supreme Court be called fair?” or should it be called anti-social or traitor? This is still unknown to the citizens of the country including me.
The decision of the Supreme Court rejecting the collective power of the OBC community came on November 21, 1992, and just 15 days later, that is, on the Mahaparinirvana day of Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, “Babri Masjid, the rush to demolish, are there conspiracies in it? No one is ready to comment on this.”
Because all Brahmin organizations (I will not say Hindu organizations) to demolish Babri Masjid. Why was Babasaheb Ambedkar’s Mahaparinirvana day chosen?
However, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar who resigned from the post of Law Minister in 1951 for the sake of the OBC community and for the rights of Hindu women, it is seen that the OBC traitors who are supporters of Brahminism and who call themselves Hindu organizations have taken care that the OBC community should not know about this resignation and the decision of the Supreme Court.
Manuvadis (Brahmins) recognized that if the citizens of the OBC community were kept astray about religion, God and temples, the rest of the community could not take over the state power of the country. Terrible conspiracies were hatched.
Still…
Even in the 75th year of Republic Day, OBCs, SCs, STs, minorities, the society has failed to recognize itself and its own rights and its own saints and great men, what to say?..
In the country of India, when the religion debate has made the economic, educational, political, cultural, industrial and social problems of the citizens of the country, the representatives of the people in this country i.e. MPs and MLAs are busy in praising the ideologies of their parties which are anti-people? What is it called a public servant? And public service?
What duty of public interest and national interest will the representatives of the people who do not understand the definition of representation under the Indian Constitution?
“Representatives of the people” who act according to the narrow and fanatical ideology of the party, leaving aside the interests of the people and the country, are not at all acceptable to the Indian Constitution…
Because Indian democracy “does not want representatives of the people who follow fanatical ideology, but representatives who protect secularism and protect sovereignty. Who will protect all the citizens of the country forever…
“Today is the Republic Day, it is celebrated as a national festival in the country. But what exactly is the Republic for the citizens of the country? This is not known yet, is it not the misfortune of this country?
It should be noted that if the citizens of the country do not recognize their right under democracy and their self-esteem and self-reliance within the right time, then the bigoted politicians will not rest unless the citizens of the country and the country are misled.
And if it goes wrong, it will be the unfortunate defeat of the citizens of this country in the era of freedom and democracy…
****
“To all my brothers and sisters in the country…
On the occasion of Republic Day…
— By Dakhal News Bharat Web Portal Parivar…
“Best wishes from the bottom of my heart!..
🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪🇳🇪
