Let’s consult all the four pillars of democracy i.e. “innocent crawling baby”, all the guardians, elders for the last 75 years….
Yesterday’s Part-3 briefly discussed the Executive Board (Central Government and State Governments). Let’s take the advice of the judiciary today.”
“The values of freedom, equality, justice and fraternity in democracy are created from natural philosophy. In these values, the principle of justice is based on the principle of equality. The same justice is expected in the implementation of this principle in democracy.”
A person who sits on the seat of justice in a democracy is the closest to natural philosophy. His heart is full of conscience. And since the constitution of the country is also filled with the same justice, naturally the moral duty to protect it, i.e. to administer justice with the same justice, came from the flow of that judge….
When both sides of the plaintiff and the accused through their lawyers make every effort to convince their own side of the truth, then the person sitting on the seat of judgment, motivated by the common sense of his heart, on the basis of natural laws, keeping in mind the legal aspects of the constitution, even partiality against anyone. There will be no injustice. Taking care of this, one has to perform the important duty of arriving at “that” truth and rendering “justice”.
This process is not only limited to the judicial system but is equally essential for administrative adjudication!
That so that the people are not deprived of natural justice.
Had the independent judiciary and administrative tribunals of our country and states provided justice in the last 75 years in accordance with the above constitutional and moral norms, today our country and states would not have started the reverse journey from freedom to slavery…
In the independent judicial system of our country i.e. the Supreme Court and the High Courts, the greatest responsibility rests with the constitution and the protection of democracy and the rights of the people.
However, for the past 70 years, the Chief Justices of these courts have been elected by collegium, so 85% of the Chief Justices are from a certain class. Since the basic human nature of this class comes from diplomacy and diplomacy is against natural justice, these courts are acting against natural justice. We have been gaining experience for the past 70 years.
That is, the first political and sub-cultural attack on this country four and a half thousand years ago, even after the last political freedom of the British, the sub-cultural slavery of the Aryas is still strong. This proves it.
Especially today’s Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Hon. Dhananjay Chandrachud sir and his father were also the Chief Justices of the Supreme Court. Similarly, Mr. Dhananjay Chandrachud’s son is also an advocate in the High Court. Finally he will also become the Chief Justice of this Supreme Court one day. ….
How is this possible…..?
So this is possible only because of collegium system..
And the Supreme Court talks about making us (SC, ST category) a criminal layer.!
First, the Supreme Court should stop the collegium system and apply the first cremiliar rule to itself. Only then should you think of others…
Well, even though these Supreme and High Courts are created to protect the Constitution in a democracy, seeing the trend of the political and social environment in the current, they keep silent where they should take a firm and strict stand. Many become firm about a single incident after the occurrence of human rights violations. This is because they either succumb to pressure from the executive board, or are eager to maintain their own diplomacy.
Just as seven and a half hundred farmers were martyred in the agitation by the farmers of Punjab against the three agricultural laws. Then the Supreme Court swallowed the moon against the central government….!
Similarly, 2000 people died in their sleep in Bhopal air disaster in 1984. 15000 people were permanently disabled. The then Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh helped the owner of that carbide company to escape to America secretly. Even then the Supreme Court and the High Court were in a quandary…
When the Supreme Court decided this case after 32 years in 2016, the Supreme Court settled the case by giving a fine and 3 months imprisonment.
In the latest example, in the Manipur case, the Supreme Court intervened and took up all the sources and tried to put an end to the violation of the human rights of the people there.
When after UNO’s Human Rights Commission condemned and India’s performance at the international level…!
After a year, the Supreme Court revealed that the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly will decide whether the Shinde group is right or the Uddhav group.
This shows that in the history of 70 years after the implementation of the constitution after the independence of this country, at least the Supreme Court would have taken a firm and strict stance against the ruler to protect the constitution, fundamental rights of the people, and human rights.
So surely our democracy and constitution would not have gone to ICU..
Now it is necessary to take all kinds of awareness battle in the hands of the people.
Author of Awakening
Anant kerbaji Bhavare
Constitution Analyst, Aurangabad, Renapurkar, 7875452689..
